How much is 0bama planning on spending in his Illegal War in Libya to protect oil flow for Europe?

August For President: How much is 0bama planning on spending in his Illegal War in Libya to protect oil flow for Europe?
There can be no other reason we are involved,except to protect oil for Libya’s primary customer,which is the europeans.Say what you want about protecting people from a brutal dictator,but we all know there are plenty of those situations that we ignore daily,so that is not the reason.

Answers and Views:

Answer by Country Club Conservative
It’s not a war, and if Europe didn’t get their oil from Libya, the price would go even higher. Simple supply and demand.

Answer by Nathan
Fun fact its not illegal, he can control the miltary just not declar way , im a reblucian and i relize that, and 16

Answer by Casey
LOL. It isn’t war. It is unified project led by France.

Answer by Chandra Sullivan
no one knows what the cost will be. It’s not his war but a UN sanctioned police action. Obviously you are anti Obama and no matter what he does you will find fault.

Answer by Thomas Jefferson
Illegal? Considering it was agreed upon by the Security Council. Considering it’s the exact same thing we did to the Serbs in the Bosnian War.

Answer by serenely, soMEone
Not much. We’re already bankrupt from the last 15 or so.

…

And, yes, if it becomes a war (however that’s supposed to be defined), it will certainly be illegal. Only Congress can declare war as was not the case in the past several wars we called “police actions” and other nice names.

…

Answer by Caliban
Obama is planning on spending no American dollars; he will borrow more money from the Chinese and spend that money. Just think, another 1,000,000,000,000 dollars of debt so that Barry Brazil Obama can look so “Presidential.”

Answer by Mr. Know
Wrong. Drinking and politics don’t mix.

Answer by Harry Dunne
Money is no object, any money the warmonger Obama needs for his illegal war for oil can be had by simply taxing “the rich”.

Answer by My Business Plan
1.3 BILLION a week.

Answer by Charles
its a un mandate lead by france. the american taxpayer just pays the bill. and we have another 3 trillion to waste before america collapses and this is a good funnel for the money.

Answer by Norman
He won’t spend a nickel on HIS “illegal war” because what is happening over Libya is (a) not Obama’s war- the USA is one of many partners (b) not illegal by international standards. Hope this clears up your confusion on this!

Answer by Richard L C
It is so hilarious to hear libs say exactly the same things conservatives did for years! I love watching libs twist in the wind. How’s that hopy changy thing workin’ our for ya! Bwhahahahahah!

Answer by Mudmarine Jones
Whatever it takes,over a million a piece for Tomahawk missiles.

Another WAR for oil.

Answer by Vesaversa1
Isn’t it a little to early to be smoking pot/

Answer by Igor T. Unspeakable
As much as he is still paying for Dumbyas 2 wars. Both of which have been a waste of lives, time and money.

Answer by badspeller
war is not Chip but also create a lot of Jobs it going to cost a billions, but we going to get back billions

Answer by oserb
It’s not war? Suppose the bombs were dropping on your neighborhood, family and friends! What would YOU call it? Wake up ! WW3 has already started one skirmish at a time. Go get ’em Killer!

Answer by Lily Hilton
I love OIL.

Answer by Non-Existent Assistant
One: it’s not illegal. Try reading UN Resolutions 1973 and 1970.

Two: There are 50 despots currently in power around the world. Are you seriously suggesting invading fifty countries ????? You do what you can where it’s practical.

Answer by WorldPeace
The President is commander of chief. He can control the military just not in a declared war. Read the United States constituion.

Answer by Rick
It’s not just a no-fly zone, it’s a demilitarization policy. HUGE difference, which is just word play by the folks that want to label this nicely. Iraq violated 14 resolutions by the UN, while mister Omar has only violated one. Personally speaking, I wasn’t for the Iraq war starting, but I felt it was necessary to clean up our mess after we came in. I’m not for Obama’s actions in this conflict, as I think Obama is not learning from Bush’s mistakes. Sun Tzu, a famous war philosopher would say that you only fight when an objective can be accomplished quickly and with as few casualties as possible. Since when has bombs ONLY…ever caused a tyrant to give up!? You’ll find it hard to find in history. Either you do it or you don’t Obama…don’t half ass it. I personally feel sorry for the children, but I think that country needs to settle it’s own business, as it’s not been friendly to us in the past…I just don’t see the interest…other than the children (which is why they should get them out and them alone). Remember for every tyrant you kill…a new one (ESPECIALLY in these countries) may arise. I’d be weary of that and thus my desire to keep out of it. Any liberal that paints this nicely, while hating Bush’s war policy…is very delusional.

Where were we in Sudan, Rwanda, Burma, etc, etc….? Is the exception oil or Muslims…are Africans, Christians and Asians less important!? Shame on you for defending a policy that’s not equal in it’s treatment of people as a whole (especially when they’re friendly to us)! So willing to defend your leader, you can’t see through the lies. At least I as a right-leaner never supported Bush’s entrances into a war he didn’t think out, maybe the liberals should take notice.