if two minors voluntarily had intercourse, why would the law favor the parents of one of them if they sued?

Philosophersage: if two minors voluntarily had intercourse, why would the law favor the parents of one of them if they sued?
I understand that if two minors have consented intercourse, the parents of one of them would be favored by the law if they presented the case to court. the sued minor may plea to a less serious offense, but they will still have serious consequences. My question is on what grounds the parents would win. their child also consented to intercourse, so isn’t their child just as culpable as the minor being sued? wouldn’t the child of the suing party be guilty of the same crimes? what is the logic under this ruling? please answer if you have experience in such cases or are studying law.

Answers and Views:

Answer by Doowawa
The man is always guilty.

Answer by Matt
you have to prove that the relationship was consensual. The issue is that one of the minors can claim rape and it’s a hearsay case… unless it can be proven that the relationship was mutually consensual and both parties knew what they were getting into

Answer by fabtastic98
Judges in general are harsher on the man.

Have you done something wrong or is your child -? Sorry just curious.

Answer by Twiztid
A child can not consent to anything, plain and simple