Audria Nicole: Does Science really provide a sufficient and adequate information in explaining such phenomena?
Science provoked different laws, theories and observations about each and every phenomena and still continue to explain such phenomena that is beyond our knowledge…. Does Science really provide a sufficient and adequate information in explaining such phenomena?. If yes, justify your answer, If not, can you please discuss an example of a phenomena that science can’t really explain.
Answers and Views:
Answer by KTDykes
If something is beyond your knowledge, whatever it may be, then you’ve obviously got no basis for sceintifically explaining it. Science requires evidence.
<>
How do you expect anybody to give an example of a phenomenon that’s beyond their knowledge? If they don’t know about, then they can’t cite it.
Answer by D.E.BunkerFairy tales aren’t explicable,dear.Answer by Paul B
We don’t know what we don’t know.
So what?
What kind of phenomena are you talking about?
And you can provoke a scientist (you just did) but you can’t provoke a law.
Answer by DanceflyI get the impression that you don’t know what you’re asking. If science explains a phenomenon (phenomena is singlular; phenomena is plural), it is by definition not beyond our knowledge.
There are many phenomena that science has not satistfactorily explained. The expansion of the universe at an increasing rate is attributed to dark energy, but no one knows what dark energy is. Most of the matter in the universe is dark matter, but no one knows what dark matter is. It is still uncertain what gives subatomic particles their masses; the Higgs boson has been proposed as an explanation but has not yet been discovered. Relatively little is known about how the brain produces consciousness. There are still debates about the evolutionary basis of altruistic behavior. There are still debates about the existence of group selection. The origin of life is still largely unexplained, although progress has been made.
Leave a Reply